top of page
Search

Analysis Of India's Position On Repugnancy And Inconsistency Of Legislations

ree



Sanjana S & Taniya Bansal, O.P. Jindal Global Law University, Sonipat

ABSTRACT

India is known to follow a federalist form of government, where there is a distinction between the Centre and the State thereby creating a distinction in terms of the laws for the same. Though this separation between the Centre and the State exists, there are certain scenarios when disputes arise between them in respect of the laws framed by each of them. This paper highlights the application of the Doctrine of Repugnancy on the Indian legislations in addition to this, it is also compared to the Australian’s take on repugnancy of its legislations.

Keywords: Doctrine of Repugnancy, Doctrine of Pith and Substance, Australian Constitution, Constitution of India, Repugnancy, Inconsistency of legislation

Comments

Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

​

Abbreviation: IJLLR

​

ISSN: 2582-8878

​

Website: www.ijllr.com

​

Accessibility: Open Access

​

License: Creative Commons 4.0

​

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page