top of page

Case Analysis On “Kasikili/Sedudu Island Case”




Ms. S. Deepika, Assistant Professor of Law, School of Law, Vel Tech University, Chennai


ABSTRACT


The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivered the judgment in case concerning Kasikili/Sedudu Island which was an original dispute between Botswana and Namibia in 1999.1 The Botswana and Namibian governments were involved in a dispute of ownership over the small island of Kasikili- Sedudu2(KS) in the Caprivi Strip existing between these states. This case plays a prominent role in application of principle of international law in determining whether the Botswana and Namibia obtains title to the disputed territories either by State Succession or by subsequent practice of the parties to the Treaty. Furthermore, it dealt about various important subject matters of international law such as interpretation of treaty under Article 31 the Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties (VCLT), Evidentiary value of Map and Prescriptive Doctrine. It also significantly depicts effective implementation of various peaceful dispute settlement methods and utilization of contemporary knowledge and scientific data in interpretation of treaties under international law.

Comentários


Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research

Abbreviation: IJLLR

ISSN: 2582-8878

Website: www.ijllr.com

Accessibility: Open Access

License: Creative Commons 4.0

Submit Manuscript: Click here

Open Access Logo

Licensing:

​All research articles published in The Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research are fully open access. i.e. immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Disclaimer:

The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of the IJLLR or its members. The designations employed in this publication and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the IJLLR.

bottom of page